George Mason
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
559  Ciara Donohue SO 21:02
853  Amber Hawkins JR 21:23
1,804  Khalilah Hamer FR 22:21
2,125  Carolyn Conley SO 22:42
2,332  Sarah Richart FR 22:56
2,433  Caitlin Kelly SO 23:04
2,515  Kyla Carte FR 23:11
2,958  Suzanne Abribat SO 24:07
3,137  Margaret Morgan FR 24:39
National Rank #191 of 344
Southeast Region Rank #26 of 50
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 25th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.8%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Ciara Donohue Amber Hawkins Khalilah Hamer Carolyn Conley Sarah Richart Caitlin Kelly Kyla Carte Suzanne Abribat Margaret Morgan
JMU Open Invitational 09/10 1211 20:44 21:17 23:06 22:57 23:09 22:42 24:15 24:31
Mason Invitational 10/01 1233 21:00 21:31 22:11 22:45 22:55 24:04 24:08 25:21
High Point Vert Invitational 10/14 1232 21:00 21:14 22:04 22:52 23:12 23:39 24:10 24:27
Atlantic 10 Championship 10/29 1231 20:59 21:22 22:26 23:16 22:54 22:58 23:12 24:21 24:40
Southeast Region Champioinships 11/11 1234 21:07 21:32 22:16 22:40 23:18 23:15 22:43





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 25.3 751 0.2 0.6 3.9 6.4 10.2 11.8 19.1 17.0 15.1 9.0 5.0 1.3 0.5



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Ciara Donohue 61.5 0.1 0.1 0.2
Amber Hawkins 93.8
Khalilah Hamer 176.7
Carolyn Conley 203.2
Sarah Richart 219.7
Caitlin Kelly 226.3
Kyla Carte 233.8




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 0.2% 0.2 19
20 0.6% 0.6 20
21 3.9% 3.9 21
22 6.4% 6.4 22
23 10.2% 10.2 23
24 11.8% 11.8 24
25 19.1% 19.1 25
26 17.0% 17.0 26
27 15.1% 15.1 27
28 9.0% 9.0 28
29 5.0% 5.0 29
30 1.3% 1.3 30
31 0.5% 0.5 31
32 0.1% 0.1 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
50 50
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0